How we know this

Every listing is built from public sources you can open yourself. This page explains where the information comes from, how much to trust it, and what we refuse to guess.

The numbers, as of this build

Listings48 — 42 physical sites and 6 county-wide programs
Sources67, of which 31 are Facebook pages or posts
Corroborated19
Single source25
Sources disagree4
Unverified0 (hidden from default results)
Listings carrying a warning17
Listings with recorded source conflicts11
Verified by phone2 of 48
Sources last researchedTuesday, September 8, 2026
This page builtSaturday, September 26, 2026, Central time

These counts are computed from the data at build time, not typed in.

Where the information comes from

Sources are ranked in tiers. When a lower tier contradicts a higher one, the higher tier wins and the disagreement is recorded on the listing.

Tier 1
County / food bank / government — 8 sources
Tier 2
Provider — 43 sources
Tier 3
Aggregator or community post — 9 sources
Tier 4
Press — 7 sources

Confidence

Corroborated
Two or more independent sources AGREE on the operative facts (schedule and access rules), not merely on the organisation's existence.
Single source
Only one source establishes the operative facts. Others may confirm the organisation exists or where it is.
Sources disagree
Sources actively conflict on an operative fact. Displayable, but the conflict must be surfaced to the user.
Unverified
Supported only by an unaudited aggregator.

“Corroborated” is deliberately strict: two sources have to agree on the operative facts — the schedule and the access rules — not merely that the organisation exists. A confidence re-audit on Tuesday, September 8, 2026 moved several listings down for exactly that reason.

What we refuse to guess

Visitor reports

Anyone can report what they found at a location. Reports are factual signals — were the hours right, was food available, were you asked for paperwork — not star ratings. A volunteer reviews each one; only approved reports are counted, and only as aggregates over the last 90 days with a minimum sample. Names, comments and emails are never published. No report changes a listing automatically: the researcher confirms with the provider, edits the data, and the change goes through the same validation as everything else.

The data itself

The directory is a single reviewed data file kept under version control, with a validator that refuses to publish a listing without a source, an expired one-time event, a “corroborated” label with fewer than two sources, or a disputed label with no recorded conflict. The public site is generated from that file; nothing is stored anywhere else. Coordinates for 17 sites come from the food bank's records; the rest are placed at their town centre and labelled approximate until someone checks them.

Questions about a specific source? Each listing's “How we know this” section links every citation. See also Help and Privacy.